|

INFORMATION
FOR ATTORNEYS > Back
To Newsletter List
Shaw Chiropractic
A Medical-Legal Newsletter for Personal
Injury Attorneys
by Dr. Steven W. Shaw
Traumatic
Brain Injury: How is it documented?
There is considerable interest these
days on the topic of closed head injury.
The seriousness of these injuries can
result in long term and profound sequella
to the injured victim. Insurance companies
seem more willing to settle these cases
for higher values than the typical strain
and sprain. Attorneys have found that
these cases are particularly lucrative
if they can be properly documented. Herein
lies the problem. How does a treating
physician provide adequate documentation
of the traumatic brain injured patient?
This newsletter will review some of the
diagnostic considerations and management
approaches which should be considered
in the TBI patient.
The majority brain injuries would be
classified as mild traumatic brain injury
(MTBI). What is the definition of a MTBI?
The Head Injury Interdisciplinary Special
Interest Group of the American Congress
of Rehabilitation Medicine has adopted
the following definition: A traumatically
induced physiologic disruption of brain
function, as manifested by one of the
following: 1)Any period of loss of consciousness;
2) Any loss of memory for events immediately
before or after the accident.; 3) Any
alteration in mental state at the time
of accident (e.g., dazed, disoriented);
4) Focal neurologic deficits, which may
or may not be transient, but when severity
does not exceed the following--loss of
consciousness for 30 minutes or less;
after 30 minutes, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS)
of 13-15; post traumatic amnesia not greater
than 24 hours"
You will notice from the definition that
loss of consciousness is not essential
to have sustained a MTBI. In fact, just
like a whiplash injury, it is the acceleration
forces which cause the majority of MTBI.
The MTBI can be from blunt trauma or acceleration.
As we have discussed on numerous occasions,
the threshold for soft tissue damage (like
brain tissue) is extremely low and can
be overcome at G forces sustained in low
velocity collisions. The brain matter
is composed of many tissues of different
densities. Through the shearing forces
encountered during brain compression against
the internal skull structures these Jello
like tissues can undergo disruption of
neuronal pathways. These injuries can
easily occur when the occupants head is
tossed back and forward but the brain
is bounced around the interior of the
cranium. Usually the brain contusion occurs
on the side opposite the direction of
head movement due to the fluid based surrounding
environment of the brain. This typical
injury is termed a coup-contracoup injury.
Symptoms often associated with the MTBI
patient include irritability, restlessness,
lack of ability to concentrate, change
in personality, and depression. Patients
find themselves intolerable to noises
and bothered by children. They often have
little control over their emotions and
frequently seem angry. They report memory
changes as well as memory deficits. They
report difficulty with sleeping or have
restless sleep associated with bad dreams.
Headache is the most common symptom as
is usually described as a dull aching,
throbbing or pressure sensation. The headaches
can occur daily for years or occur only
intermittently. They may report speech
difficulties due to problems completing
the thought process. Tinitus, a ringing
in the ear, is also common. Vision changes
are also common but not associated with
abnormal opthalmologic findings.
Diagnostic evaluation of these MTBI can
be challenging since they are usually
not the result of a organic lesion and
therefore somewhat obscure in presentation.
The challenge as always is the objectification
of the brain damage for 3rd party verification
as well as proper management. Attached
to this newsletter you will find a list
of diagnostic procedures available for
brain injuries and their relative value
in support of the diagnosis. These include
x-rays to rule out fracture, CT, MRI,
PET, SPECT, BAER, EEG, and BEAM. After
reviewing the procedures you will find
that while it may be a challenge these
injuries can be objectively documented.
A greater challenge will more than likely
will be finding a physician who is sensitive
to these types of injuries and willing
to make the necessary referrals to properly
and accurately diagnosis these unfortunate
and often overlooked patients.
X-Ray: Although essential
in the initial evaluation of head trauma
to rule out fracture many patients with
blunt trauma will require more sophisticated
imaging techniques to assess for intracranial
bleeding as well as fractures not readily
seen on plain film radiographs
CAT: Computed Axial Tomography
permits the examination of tissue by the
same principle as conventional x-ray except
that radiation passes successively through
tissue from multiple directions. Detectors
measure the degree of attenuation of the
exiting radiation and computers integrate
the information and construct cross sectional
images. Use of contrast material enhances
the attenuation and provides greater insight
into the integrity of the blood brain
barrier. CT has the advantage of a short
study time and is therefore the preferred
method of imaging for rapidly evolving
neurologic disorders such as those seem
with intracranial bleeding. It is also
advantageous in the evaluation of bone
and therefore is better suited for the
detection of acute cranial fracture. Adverse
effect of CT include relatively high doses
of ionizing radiation. It is also significantly
less sensitive than MRI for brain stem
and cerebellum imaging in the posterior
fossa as well as the temporal lobes of
the middle fossa. The cost of CAT is approximately
½ of MRI imaging for similar areas.
MRI Magnetic Resonance Imaging
studies place body tissues in strong magnetic
fields thereby polarizing the naturally
occurring isotopes (atoms). A transient
application of a radio frequency pulse
perpendicular to the magnetic field reorients
the atoms and when the pulse is turned
off it attempts to return to the polarized
orientation. There is a resulting resonance
which is measured by receiver coils and
integrated into images which can be constructed
from nearly any angle. Recent developments
have permitted the assist of the contrast
medium gadolinium thereby providing information
about the blood-brain barrier like the
CAT scan. MRI is advantageous since there
is no ionizing radiation and is very sensitive
to blood flow. Recent advances in computer
techniques using ultrafast and echoplanar
acquisition have made MRI and CT equally
fast. However, these newer techniques
do not provide as much information as
the traditional spin echo images. MRI
is superior to CT in visualizing the neurologic
structures. New techniques including MRA,
MR Spectroscopy and Functional MR provide
information regarding cerebral metabolites,
brain pH, neurotransmitters, cerebral
blood flow, oxygenation of hemoglobin.
PET Positron Emission Tomography
uses a radio ligand with a positron emitting
isotope which upon radioactive decay collide
with electrons. The collision results
in annihilation of both particles and
releases energy in the form of twp photons
(gamma rays) which can be detected by
the scanner. The test can identify cerebral
metabolic rates for glucose, and measure
cerebral blood flow. The use of PET is
limited by it’s high cost and need
for a cyclotron nearby. It also has restricted
temporal and spatial resolution.
SPECT Single Photon Emission
Computed Tomography is similar
to PET except the radio ligand decay emits
only 1 photon. The test is valuable particularly
for cerebral blood flow as seen with subarachnoid
hemorrhage. SPECT has shortcomings of
restricted resolution and quantitation
and limited versatility for studying cerebral
biochemistry and metabolism. Cost for
this procedure are also extremely high.
EEG Electroencephalography
is a measure of the brains electrical
activity. It is performed by applying
a series of electrodes to the scalp in
specific montages and measuring the electrical
activity of the brain. This test has been
very helpful for patients with seizure
disorders but does not provide much information
on patients with closed head trauma or
post traumatic headache.
BAER Brainstem Auditory Evoked
Response testing evaluates the
integrity of a portion of the nervous
system as it passes through to the brainstem.
People with post traumatic brainstem injuries
may show abnormalities of conduction through
electrical generators which may suggest
shearing of nerve fibers and end bulbs
in the tracts between the diencephalon
and brainstem.
BEAM Brain Electrical Activity
Mapping (AKA Topographic Brain
Mapping, Quantitative EEG, Brain Mapping)
combines the technology of a EEG with
evoked potential methodology to produce
color maps representing the electrical
activity of the brain. The test allow
for little subjective evaluation. TBI
patients may have structural damage which
leads to cortical disconnections resulting
in an imbalance of brain chemistry and
neurotransmission. The BEAM can locate
these disconnections with a relatively
high degree of certainty. Very mild scarring
can be detected and recovery can be monitored.
Some controversy exists to the validity
of the test.
Neuropsychometric Testing:
Neuropsychometric testing is the domain
of the neuropsychologist. Not all psychologists
are trained as neuropsychologists. In
fact, there is specific postgraduate training
required to be qualified. These specialists
run batteries of tests lasting from 2
hours to two days to determine the extent
of the brain injury. Their examinations
are thorough and provide significant insight
into the areas of brain damage and the
potential for rehabilitation. Neurologists
and physiatrists may treat TBI victims
but generally do not perform neuropsychometric
testing. Chiropractors, neurologists and
physiatrists are generally the specialists
requesting these evaluations.
These tests and evaluations can objectively
document the traumatic brain injury effects
of a closed head trauma. Knowing which
test to order and when to order them is
critical for proper evaluation. Finding
a physician who is both familiar with
and sensitive to these injuries may present
a greater challenge. At SHAW CHIROPRACTIC
we work with physicians and testing centers
sensitive to the needs of your clients
and our patients. Call us for more information.
800-232-6824
|