|

INFORMATION
FOR ATTORNEYS > Back
To Newsletter List
Shaw Chiropractic
A Medical-Legal Newsletter for Personal
Injury Attorneys
by Dr. Steven W. Shaw
Videofluoroscopy
of the Spine
I was recently asked by an attorney why
there was no way to objectively document
his client’s neck pain. He could
not understand why the MRI was negative
if a problem really existed. I explained
that most spinal complaints are of a mechanical
nature and therefore will not be demonstrated
on conventional studies designed to image
anatomical abnormalities. Unlike a disc
herniation or fracture, a mechanical lesion
can only be demonstrated using a test
which measures functional alterations.
To appreciate the functional versus structural
concept you may want to consider a patient
with a kidney infection. Imaging studies
of the kidneys would most likely be normal.
However, functional tests like blood chemistry
and urine analysis would demonstrate the
functional components of the infection.
In a similar fashion, a person who was
neck pain with pain referred down the
arm may have EMG abnormalities in the
absence of a disc herniation or tumor.
Many of the bodies illnesses are functional
rather than anatomical and therefore assessed
in a different manner than anatomical
lesions. Unfortunately, we have become
so crazed with the anatomical imaging
studies like MRI, CT, Ultrasound, X-ray,
etc that we don’t always look for
the right test. Rather, we do what has
become habit.
Several months ago, A well respected
Hartford lawyer called me upon returning
from a national trial lawyers meeting
in Las Vegas. He was excited about this
"new" technology he had just
studied. He could not get over the incredible
benefits of the procedure and encouraged
me to look into it further. The technology
he was referring to is called video fluoroscopy
(VF).
Fortunately, I was very familiar with
the VF procedures and in fact have owned
a VF machine for several years. I have
been reluctant to use the test since no
one in the New England area had been using
the technology for this specific approach.
In our office we only used the VF technology
when it was absolutely necessary and perhaps
we erred in our too conservative patient
selection criteria.
VF is also known as fluoroscopy, cine-radiography
and fluorovideo motion analysis. Every
hospital in the country has a fluoroscopic
suite which they use during upper and
lower GI studies as well as during invasive
injection techniques such as facet blocks.
Orthopedic surgeons will use the technology
during surgical procedures to determine
if joint replacements are installed and
functioning properly. In a similar manner
the fluoroscope can be used to assess
spinal function to determine abnormal
coupling patterns of adjacent vertebra.
VF imaging is a form of low dose x-ray
which is recorded like a movie x-ray.
In the early days the recording medium
used was movie film and thus it was termed
cine-radiography. With the advances in
video capture and storage the term video
fluoroscopy has become popular. Regardless
of the name the procedure which is very
low in radiation exposure can demonstrate
the movement of the spine during multiple
planes of motion.
The test is valuable for several reasons.
First, it can assess the ligamentous integrity
of the spine by showing areas of laxity
and instability. Second, unlike stress
x-ray films which are limited to end range
analysis, motion patterns can be evaluated
assisting in the determination of transitional
abberancies in joint coupling from muscular
imbalances, joint disorders and pathology.
Finally, VF is a visual technology which
can easily be demonstrated to concerned
parties such as patients, insurance adjusters
and jurors. In conjunction with a written
report and a verbal explanation a multi-modal
sensory input will allow for better appreciation
of the abnormalities. This is exactly
the type of information a jury can digest
for a better appreciation of a clients
injuries. The video information is easy
to see and is real time so that it keeps
their attention
|